The estate of Samantha Deschenes, a skilled ironworker tragically lost in a workplace incident, has filed a lawsuit against Andersen Construction, underscoring deep concerns over safety protocols and accountability in the construction industry.

According to the complaint filed by Carol Ruvolo, Deschenes’ mother, the incident occurred during her work on the Benson Polytechnic High School Modernization project in Portland. A forklift accident resulted in fatal injuries to Deschenes, who later succumbed to complications during surgery. The lawsuit, seeking approximately $25.5 million in damages, alleges violations of the Oregon Safe Employment Act and negligence on the part of Andersen Construction.

Deschenes, 33 years old at the time of her death, was employed by REFA Erection, a subcontractor to Andersen Construction. The complaint asserts that Andersen failed in its duty to provide a safe working environment. It highlights several specific allegations, including inadequate safety policies and supervision failures on the Benson project site.

"Every accident on a construction site is preventable, particularly under the oversight of a general contractor like Andersen. This tragedy should never have occurred," commented Joe Piucci, legal representative for the plaintiffs.

Andersen Construction, a prominent player in Oregon's construction sector, has declined to provide comments on the matter. Known for overseeing major projects such as the downtown Hilton Hotel and Kaiser Westside Medical Center, the company faces scrutiny over its safety practices amidst the lawsuit.

This lawsuit not only seeks compensation for a devastating loss but also raises broader questions about workplace safety in high-risk industries. It prompts reflection on the responsibility of employers to uphold stringent safety standards and the consequences of any lapses in their implementation.

In conclusion, Samantha Deschenes' untimely death serves as a poignant reminder of the critical need for rigorous safety measures across all workplaces. As legal proceedings unfold, the outcome of this case could potentially influence industry-wide practices, urging stakeholders to prioritize safety above all else.